Friday, 31 July 2015

The bar the books and reflections on power

“...the change was adjustment without improvement.”
Toni Morrison, The Bluest Eye


The past few weeks have been at once inspiring, confusing and frustrating. There’s something prodding around inside like that mysterious toxin for which we used to be given a ‘wash out’ when I was a child. I’m hoping this shout will adequately expel it without sullying my integrity.

No colour bar opens
Eric Huntley made a comment that stuck with me at the preopening of the No Colour Bar exhibition a few weeks ago. He remarked that it was an irony that the exhibition was being held at the Guildhall, part of the City of London – a distinct corporation built from the profits of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. It was a subtle, but powerful point, illustrating how far and where to Africans have come in our struggles; indeed to dismantle the imposing, racist colour bar. He linked the installation of the former Bogle L’Ouverture bookshop, a central feature of the exhibition to the silk cotton tree, a symbol of our struggle, and from which the City of London Corporation acquired its status.


The exhibition, fully titled ‘No Colour Bar: Black British Art in Action 1960-1990’ (which lasts until January 2015) is a collaboration between Friends of the Huntley Archives at the London Metropolitan Archives (FHALMA), The Guildhall art Gallery (GAG) and London Metropolitan Archives (LMA). It is impressive; the location of the Guildhall art Gallery couldn’t fail to do this. There’s a curious interplay between old and new on entering the building; the gallery is itself relatively new (opened in 1999); the discovery of Roman ruins in the Ampitheatre adds a remarkable feature to this interplay between old and new. By old I also mean that in the Guildhall area, let alone the gallery itself one observes the embodiment of something well preserved or the uncontested permanence of privilege. By new, I refer to the fact that Africans were there, somewhat superimposed or sort of on the surface, but there never the less and proud to be to celebrate the opening of the No Colour Bar. This pride was expressed in beaming smiles and those faces people pull when words won’t work momentarily to say – ‘not bad, eh?’


There was something else about the ‘newness.’ Bogle L’Ouverture books were in the ‘Shop’ as you enter the gallery to the right. Eric Huntley had seen to it that a range of books, including my Elijah, by African authors were represented. Downstairs, in the basement the stunning exhibition opens, which includes exhibits from over 70 artists and activists. Protest is the theme – as reflected in the No Colour Bar title; protest about art being also about ‘action’ and decanting the marginalisation of African people, not only in the UK.

You know how much went into organising the exhibition; a lot of hard, voluntary hours for which one must tip hat and charmingly nod at the organisers for their wonderful efforts. You get the sense too that lots of love went into the careful selection of those exhibits to say what needs to be said about art and activism during the period displayed. You know too, that the selection process couldn’t have been easy, with so much to choose from. Sonia Boyce, Paul Dash, Errol Lloyd, Aubrey Williams, Keith Piper, Ronald Moody are a few of the artists whose works are on display. There’s a remarkable sculpture by Sokari Douglas Camp downstairs of a Nigerian woman going to market or doing shopping (the full title escapes). It’s made of stainless steel, each bit of imagined fabric (to make the dress) carefully linked to give a 3d impression of a woman inside the sculpture. You’ll have to go see it to fully appreciate.


One of my favourite pieces is the bust of Jessica Huntley, by George Kelly (Fowokan). Carefully positioned at pride of place as you enter the exhibition, her vision and version of ‘overseeing’ is an unmistakable statement. They said not to take photos. Some ignored the order, just to be snapped beside her, lapping her legacy and strength. I was mesmerised by this bust, as though trying to ‘read’ what she was mediating in this moment, made in hers and Eric Huntley’s honour. Accabre, their daughter drew me from the moment – asking – ‘what do you think she’d be saying?’ I thought she might be wondering, what next – asking if ‘da is it?’ she might also ask; ‘wheh we own deh?’ Meaning, where’s our actual art gallery – preserved, real and lasting. It may be nice to sup at the master’s table but we want more than this. We deserve and demand it.

This moves me to consider the major part of the exhibition. The installation of the Huntleys’ bookshop – described in the brochure as ‘a multi-sensory, interactive installation’ which for me extends the impression of ‘newness’ is a remarkable recreation of the original bookshop. It includes material from the Huntleys’ extensive archives (now lodged at the LMA), and an enormous map showing the reach and range of black bookshops and organisations that used to be across the UK. Most of these are now gone. And I wondered about that – the installation, a black bookshop featuring as a museum piece in place of an actual one we need. You see we’re still writing and publishing our books, maybe even more so with the advent of self-publishing. But marginalisation persists. So we have an adjustment, in truth. It would have been inconceivable at one time that such an exhibition would be at the Guildhall. Improvement is another stage and I know Jessica Huntley’s presence in our hearts and minds will straighten our focus so we know how to position our gaze for posterity and prosperity.


BCA Bogle Book Fair
Bogle L’Ouverture Publications (BLP) in continuing to create opportunities to empower us through the word collaborated with Black Cultural Archives (BCA) to host a Book Fair on Saturday 18th July. A few of us are involved in trying to keep BLP’s legacy alive. There is a large back stock of books, titles I think have relevancy today: Groundings with my brothers (Walter Rodney), Ackee, Breadfruit and Callaloo (a creole alphabet book, by Valerie Bloom), In the Trickster Tradition (anancy stories, Peter Nazareth), Easter Monday Blues (Accabre Huntley on growing up as first generation African Caribbean in London), Roots of Black History (Robin Walker), Pulling on Punches (a newer publication, on domestic violence, by Luke Daniels). And many more that give a picture of the struggles, experiences, contributions and aspirations of African peoples in the UK and internationally. A book fair was thus organised.


It aimed to (re)emphasise the power of books, the printed word, since we know we’re competing with technology and the advent of print on demand, mega corporate Amazon. A book fair, and one organised by BCA and Bogle would remind us that we are not idly accepting the closures of black bookshops/organisations; that we are still writing and publishing and seeking to master distribution of our books and bringing it to the people. Collaborating, combining our resources is a progressive approach to make it happen.

These photos are by Eddie Ossei

We hoped for a good, sunny day and positive turn out. It was indeed, as called for, a beautiful day. The bookstalls included were: African Musical Instruments (selling children’s colour and story books and musical instruments), Black Book Swap (both new and second hand books – they organise an annual book swap linked to interviews with contemporary writers), Black Women in the Arts (promotes new and elder writers and artists, especially retired nurses), JJBola writes (introducing his new collection of poems – Word; his reading/spoken word of a few of the pieces was a real treat), Jacaranda (with founder Valerie Brandes and their new releases, Butterfly Fish, From Pasta to Pigfoot both in WH Smiths), Maat Books (Pepukayi’s amazing selection of books), Narrative Eye (their brilliant book titled Blackamoores in Tudor England), Bogle L’Ouverture Publications and Way Wive Wordz, as well as cards/gifts and prints from Alvin Kofi and Ken McKalla.


We were in the beautiful BCA court yard. Talks had been organised to take place in meeting rooms, along with a creative writing workshop inside the BCA, but numbers meant we could do everything in the courtyard. There was a fantastic vibe that I can only imagine (with elevated expectations) might have reached fever pitch with more people being made aware of the event. Next time, I’m told. Next time it will be bigger/better. And reason and patience should supersede my incomprehension that this time there was a missed opportunity to market the event better, make the most of the wandering Brixtonians on such a gorgeous Saturday afternoon, many of them heading to the buzzing Lambeth Country Show. I fancied that those wanderers could have sauntered into the book fair on their way to the Show.


We had relied on the BCA to market the event to its list of contacts as Bogle doesn’t have such a list. So the less than potential turn out indeed means we must look forward the ‘next time.’ In the process, however, we learn something valuable. We need each other now more than ever; that collaborations like the example that has afforded the successful No Colour Bar exhibition require unified, commitment. That we cannot annihilate our own efforts; if anything we must strengthen our alliances, learn from and teach each other how to build our institutions. Last weekend marked the 1st anniversary of the opening of the BCA. The cruel, poignancy of hindsight makes me ponder whether the book fair and the anniversary might have been organised together to thereby maximise attendance and participation. I am confident this would have demonstrated the BCA’s commitment, as stated on its website of being a ‘welcoming space for everyone to learn, explore and become inspired by Black British heritage and history.’ As for BLP, it would have reflected its mission to empower through books and celebrate our collective, cultural legacies. We live and learn so the focus for next time is clearer.

Photos by Eddie Ossei

Reflections of power
One of the wisdoms I value from Toni Morrison is her view that the ‘black is beautiful’ slogan had/has in it both paradox and power. Power because it instilled confidence and self-belief where there was little or none, at a time of heightened political activism in the 1960s (not only in the US but globally, sparked by such as Marcus Garvey a long time before then); paradox because it bound us to behaving or responding in a particular way to the white (‘man’s’) gaze. We said we were beautiful, not because we knew it intrinsically/unapologetically (as Morrison means when she says ‘who you telling, me?…I know I’m beautiful…’) but because we wanted to shout the proof of it. You see Morrison knew that when white people wrote their books (which she studied) they never apologised, or explained or skirted around issues. They spoke/wrote their truth. Most of their truth avoided (marginalised) us (as is the theme of her book Whiteness and the Literary Imagination - the erasing of Africans in America in literature by white writers). When we speak to white people I sometimes feel there’s a tendency to ‘cater’ to their limited understanding of ‘us’ and our struggles, or we curb our tongue as though we ‘feel it for them’ that they wont ‘get where we’re coming from’ or be hurt by our truth (in which they are by contrast, due largely to the inhuman institutionalising of racism, always present).


This was the feeling creeping over me as I listened to the conversation between Eddie Chambers and Errol Lloyd, at one of the No Colour Bar’s series of mini events inserted into the whole exhibition. The conversation was called ‘Framing Black Visual Artists’ chaired by Sonia Dyer. A tight, restrictive dialogue was exchanged between the artists and chair, mostly about marginalisation of black artists, especially in terms of more commercial spaces and opportunities for exhibitions. The speakers weren’t in agreement that things hadn’t changed in this regard; after all we were at the Guildhall. But from the basic title of their conversation, which includes the qualification despised by Toni Morrison ‘black’… visual artists’ it can be said that the conversation was being directed to the Other (in other words not to Africans?) in conveying our presence. The conversation seemed framed in an artificial way, I couldn’t help thinking it subconsciously imposed a bar(rier) that prevented comfortable/natural dialogue. I wondered whether this was due to being at the Guildhall, with the prestige it carried. Eddie Chambers seemed to want to say something more than he felt he should or could. I sensed he was holding back; struggling with his own niggling integrity. I hope I’ve misread the moment because I think the power of free expression is the artist’s most precious tool and indeed should rise above - if not set their own bar. Yet contrasting this tightness in his throat is his enormous canvass denouncing Apartheid and profits earned therefrom by complicit UK corporations.

If we’re stumped by circumstance then we’re playing up to the master, a symbol of oppression, playing to their tune, which will bamboozle our efforts to take on the master. We cannot assume that because the No Colour Bar demonstrates an adjustment, that the opportunity would automatically render our marginalisation defunct. So when we’re given the chance I think we can be bold about how we feel about our oppression and move on to transformative action. Our empowerment is about our will to consciously act. When we accept the master’s invitation to dinner what good is it to choke on the meal or be amazed by the glittering crockery? Knowing there may not be another chance, no ‘next time,’ we should make each moment matter. Be grateful for the concession but demand more. The dynamic between us and the master is power. We should not see the opportunity merely as an instance to ‘wrestle’ power from the master but make plain that the inequalities are abhorrent; they exist because of their whip, musket and feats of inhumanity that keep us baying for opportunities, not for some of us but for all. We take that fine dining moment to demand, not a satiable adjustment but a seismic improvement.


So at the Framing Visual Artists event, an audience member wanted the conversation to focus a bit on the work/the art itself, as opposed to the ‘racism’ that overshadows (even as it inspires) it. I couldn’t help but wonder why the large screen didn’t feature some of the work, but instead looped a publication that used to be in circulation. Another audience member mentioned the work of Ken McKalla and Alvin Kofi who exhibit from their homes - I’ve visited both these ‘open house’ exhibitions, in South London, they are wonderful. The point is of course that in this way they need no invitation to the master’s table or house but the exposure would matter a great deal. A good point was made that we should invest in purchasing original works by our artists, lest some conspiracy is afoot to profit from their death and by which they are deliberately denied wider acclaim in their lifetimes.

Setting the bar
My frustrations were borne of assumptions I need to adjust. I thought that when we talk about ‘struggle’ we were speaking for all ‘Africans.’ When we talk about ‘our experiences’ and ‘our community’ and ‘collectivism’ and ‘unity’ these meant for ‘all Africans.’ Naively, I forgot class contradictions always play a meddling part in any effort for collective actions. The ‘collective’ has limitations; the ‘people’ naturally pose problems relating to socio-economic differences; some of these prevail as a consequence of our education. Yet burrowing my head in sand like a fickle ostrich won’t make the nagging feeling go away. I’ve come to realise that we Africans are caught up in the quagmire of individualistic capitalism we’re in danger of losing consciousness/focus. If we are still fighting against a simple call to be ‘unified’ and embed our psyche with a vision for our collective empowerment we are culpable in perpetuating our own marginalisation. In all spheres of our doing, being and thinking how difficult might it be to aspire fully to our collective improvement.


I had ended this shout at that last paragraph. But I couldn’t leave it there without paying homage to the powerful presentation by Fowokan last Saturday on his work featured at the Guildhall. His presentation was a refreshing contrast to the Framing Black Visual artists’ conversation with Errol Lloyd, Sonia Dyer and Eddie Chambers. It may be because he was actually taking us on a journey of how he developed those stunning sculptures. It was an unprogrammed event but who ever had the idea to do it must be commended. You see we were given a window into the artist’s imagination and motivation; it was wonderful to hear his inspiration to create the pieces. Take as example the sculpture of Olokun, the goddess of the deep ocean, an orisa, ‘emissaries of Oludumare,’ he told us. At the time of developing this piece Fowokan had come across the Zong slave ship massacre. Enslaved Africans were being shipped across the Atlantic, a number of them were falling ill, (caused by potable water shortage) and thus losing their value. The ship was owned by the Gregson Slave Trading Syndicate whose crew members decided to throw the 142 enslaved Africans overboard and claim insurance from them (as they were cargo, valued in the same way as any other business investment). Fowokan told us he was seriously affected by this horrific event, one of many in the holocaust of slavery, he came up with the Olokun sculpture. He visualised her as guardian, gatherer, comforter of those Africans captured and drowned by capitalist murderers. The venom you may perceive is sparked by the screening in this same period of Britain’s forgotten Slave Owners – 46,000 men/women profiting not only from the trade in humans but barbarically from the abolition of the trade. That 17billion the programme emphasised they claimed as compensation does not go anywhere near the billions they were making and continue to make for the very corporation the No Colour Bar exhibition is housed in. Tomorrow, August 1st was the day allotted our emancipation. There has never been an apology for slavery by Britain/Europe. Our presence in the belly marks some kind of change but reparations must come for there to be anything like the improvement that might satiate the terror our ancestors endured. Until then, they might well be the cause of what’s prodding around my insides.


An unmistakable spiritual power is invested in Fowokan’s work. He envisions their permanence – which for me expresses the foundation for his own uncompromising power. His work will be a legacy that will keep the traditions of our ancestors alive. Those two busts on the right and left are guardians seated at the entrance to the exhibition – emissaries indeed. Jessica Huntley is in the centre of the trinity as you enter. As for the inspiration behind the development of this bronze bust of Jessica Huntley Fowokan expanded our consciousness by revealing why and how ordinary people who do extraordinary things within their lifetimes become immortalised, become divine. This power is embodied in the bust of Jessica Huntley. Usually behind the camera, it was delightful to have Fowokan at centre. He recharged my spirit that sunny Saturday morning by showing that the artist activist won’t be satisfied with simply removing the bar but they will actively set their own. And thankfully that bar won’t be coloured by restrictions and limited states of consciousness.


Shout out

Thursday, 28 May 2015

National Unity in Guyana: the time has come



Seeing is believing

One had to allow it to sink in. To make up one’s own mind that despite the collective euphoria of Guyanese people at home and abroad that it was all real. It still feels surreal. And were it not for the blow by blow accounts of what was happening, particularly via social media we in the diaspora wouldn’t feel so connected, as though we were there. My cousin’s WhatsApp of our new President David Granger, leading the coalition that defeated the PPP/C came almost immediately after the official announcement, following a long wait for the results. The caption under his official, smiling face simply read: President. Another image was of the jointly raised hands of the African Guyanese President and the new Prime Minister, Indo-Guyanese Moses Nagamoottoo; together symbolising racial and national unity.

That bone of scepticism, the tendency to not fall easily in the line, but keep a relative critical distance, consider properly what it all really means have given way to the dreaminess of it all. Like most thinking Guyanese, who would honestly argue that the last 23 years under the PPP/C have been marred by ridiculous gangster style corruption, racism, nepotism, high unemployment, poor educational attainment and aspirations for young people, untold abuses of women (including that experienced by the former President Jagdeo’s wife, Varshnie Singh by the man himself) and most heinous of these the extra-judicial killings of over 400 Guyanese, most of them African young males, I join in the cheer.

It’s still not well known that Guyana’s land mass is the same size as the UK (England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales put together). Whilst this population is 64 million, the population of Guyana is circa 740,000 (we have a large diaspora residing in the US, UK, Canada). Again, that’s SEVEN HUNDRED and FORTY THOUSAND people in a country the size of the UK. With such a small population, for there to be over 400 murders in the past 23 years characterises the dark days now being overshadowed by the promise of change – and the reason for which many Guyanese feel they can exhale. This because those dark days were sanctioned by a government who threw funds at the GDF (Guyana Defence Force) to establish “Death Squads” bordering on the likeness of Haiti’s terrifying ton ton Macoutes to repress crimes, sinisterly in areas where Africans were predominant.



Incongruity

The link with Haiti doesn’t stop there. Like Haiti, Guyana is considered one of the poorest countries in the region (of Latin America and Caribbean). The somewhat misidentification as being ‘Caribbean’, and even ‘Latin America’ whereas it is in mainland South America positions Guyana in either what might be thought ‘unique’ or ‘confusing’ when it comes to identity. This ‘economic indicator’ as one of the world’s poorest countries always strikes a note of frustration and disgust, because Guyana has everything to make it an oasis of prosperity in said region, and one which can easily share its resources to develop the region. Rich in gold, bauxite, diamond, timber; able to export rice, sugar, fish; having one of the world’s largest single drop waterfall (Kaieteur); a well preserved rainforest make it possible for Guyana’s economic indicators to yield growth. Good governance and true vision would make this possible.

It’s not easy to have vision, though it’s inherent in political rhetoric. I recall during my first return visit to Guyana in 1994 being baffled by several things:
-low wages for workers
-observing at a Guyana expo the clean paddy-free rice bound for export compared to the gritty, dirty rice sold to resident Guyanese
-many roads had not changed much since I left (1980); plenty potholes from poor development, failure to recognise the might and abundance of the rains
-continuous black outs - used to not mind these for telling jumbie stories - but really, those stories could still be told by candlelight - with folk choosing to do so?
-no potable water and shortages in certain areas at certain time; water running red
-high cost of living – just buying a bag of groceries for a family was costly – luxury fruits like ‘ice apples’ (red apples we get here) cost much more than we’d pay here - didn't understand why they were promoting these so much anyway - and grapes!
- fattened foreign chicken imported and costing less than the local one - in fact the local version, naturally grown (organic you might say) was almost scorned.
-transport system that was a hideous hustle – a feeble attempt to nationalise this system that just didn’t work

Yet, fast forward 10 years, and then 20, things became much worse. Superficially, Guyana seemed to be ‘developing’ if we class new homes being built, traffic lights (even if cheaply bought and not so fit for purpose), new banks opening; the advent of eco-tourism in the country; a spate of new shopping malls (some of them fronts in truth); crazy amounts of imported cars – including a pseudo New-York style yellow taxi influx; that Mariott Hotel to compete with Pegasus, the big Casino and so on as ‘development’ and ‘progress.’ But this paint job didn’t hide the overriding poverty experienced by the masses of Guyanese. Already racially divided, over the years the Indo-Guyanese would appear to fair better than the second majority population of Africans in Guyana. But this too was superficial – blind allegiance to the ruling Indo-led government made it difficult for those Indo-Guyanese not able to splash out at splashmins every Sunday, eat out on the top level of New Thriving restaurant to see sense and acknowledge that they too were suffering. The native, Amerindian population would be given concessions - jobs in the city, for example, changing the dynamic I used to see when I returned the first time – for I now saw more Amerindians in security jobs. They appeared more ‘visible’ even though this was the same time that the once loved Timehri Airport (named as homage to the Amerindians under Forbes Burnham) was disrespectfully renamed Cheddi Jagan International Airport. But the ‘visibility’ of the Amerindians would also lend credit to the international acclamation bestowed on Bharrat Jagdeo by the United Nations. This article, titled – ‘Extra-Judicial Killings in Guyana: “Champion of the Earth” Presides over Death Squads’ sums up the bizarreness of this, ‘no matter how environmentally correct Jagdeo appears on the world stage, Champion of the Earth is no title for a man who heads one of the most corrupt and repressive regimes in the Caribbean and South America.’


Rising from the mare

It had seemed like the longest nightmare. Protests and demonstrations over the years seemed to fall on international deaf ears. It had become too familiar, too hopeless. Tensions were always high and peaked that year the previous government thought it made sense to cripple the African Guyanese community of Linden by raising electricity prices 70%. Naturally Lindeners said ‘hell no’ resulting in the killings on July 18, 2012 of three African men by the Guyana Police Force. The outcry of Guyanese at home and in the diaspora was immense. It was a domestic affair, that’s true and intervention by outsiders had to be certain the apparent accusations of state sanction killings were provable. In truth, intervention didn’t and wouldn’t come because what would be the interest, the benefits to the players, the world’s leading nations who oversee the affairs of every country in the world and intervene when they feel threatened by them or when they smell something to gain. But the people of Guyana and those outside who still adore their country persevered, wanted justice, had tired of the stupidness;expats wanted to go back home, if not for good, to do some good and exchange some of their earned skills in the hope of restoring Guyana to those days that I am too young to properly remember as being ‘golden.’ For it’s not easy to think there really were such dreamy days; of walks in the promenade gardens, the canals being unblocked and clean, the pavements being less burdened by sellers of all kinds of plastic wares along which lovers holding hands could stroll without the ‘rat poison’ guy and ‘check yoh body weight’ seller or the middle aged woman vendor of small packets of biscuits or anything she could get her hands on to earn her family’s crust; the sea wall being rid of the nastiest litter in a country whose president won an award for environmentalism.

One must arise from the nightmare and boldly believe in the dream. Or should we keep one eye open?

Following the election on May 11th and after nail biting four days of waiting for the results, it finally came. It took a coalition of previously opposing parties, including the former opposition Peoples’ National Congress Reform (PNC/R) and the Working Peoples’ Alliance (WPA) to marginally defeat the PPP/C. A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and the Alliance for Change (AFC) won just 50.3% of the 412,000 votes cast. Incredible! It was the only strategy to get rid of the regime everyone (who were not motivated to side with them based on racial affinity alone) recognised as embarrassingly/blatantly corrupt. I must note that when I say everyone, it's troubling that despite the corruption this government clearly exercised, the support for them is incredible - and the present government barely defeated them.


Open spotlight

In my lifetime, I’ve not witnessed a more welcomed change of government in the country of my birth. I know it would have happened when Cheddi Jagan took power after the PNC’s reign ended in 1992. And in fairness, during those 23 years of PPP’s rule Jagan’s quality of leadership marks a distinction between then and what we came to know. As Nicholas Birns convincingly writes, ‘for a generation the PPP had attracted worldwide progressive sympathies.' This was because the party had been ‘eclipsed’ by two decades of Burnham’s regime. Though Burnham and Jagan had been former allies under the PPP’s historical national liberationist government, they became divided along racial lines; ‘as one of the few non-ideological antagonisms in Latin America and the Caribbean during the Cold War Epoch,’ according to Birns, with the suggestion that the end of the Cold War made his election victory possible (US and UK could ease up, not intervene as they had done in 1953). The world has changed considerably especially in relation to technology since 1992; back then there was no social media. Whether the coalition made use of the resource or whether this was just down to the widespread support and dissatisfaction with the outgoing government doesn’t matter. This is how the world saw the reception to the regime change in Guyana on May 16th when the former army general David Arthur Granger was sworn in as the 9th President of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana.

And he did something feel-good hours after his swearing in; or rather the thing was done and again paraded on social media. Images of a drive to clean up the city; black bags and cranes hauling muck from the filthy canals in Georgetown was a welcome sight. The message was clear, this government will renovate, restore, uplift, clean up and give the people a real fresh start.The people too, must be ready to do their part; with such a fragile margin of victory, and given that the country belongs to the people, the 'new look' and serious changes cant be left to the government alone.


Of course, the dreamer must believe in our new President when he says, 'the time has come to end winner-take-all politics, corruption, nepotism and the squandering of our resources.' What use is it to remain sceptical, like some doubting Thomas when Granger goes in hard and hits home those sweet sound-bites all Guyanese really want to hear; for they speak to the needs of the people, shows an empathy with their suffering. He does so with the high regard he has for the constitution, for democracy. That pretty wordy, 200 page document surely warrants another revisit, though, given the lawlessness and ‘disrespect’ that took place in the last four decades following independence. One example is that there has not been a locally held election since 1994, when these are supposed to be held every three years!

A ‘president for all the people,’ is the sentiment of the new leader. We agree that’s what’s needed; so maybe half open the other eye? He will be a president whose promises are the stuff of our long awaited Guyanese dreams for real, heading a ‘multi-racial inclusionary democracy’ as a way of stemming historical divisions. Open the eye more fully and believe it will really happen, that he will reverse the script of atrocities of ‘high crime rates, armed robbery, arson, rapes, road fatalities, murder, people trafficking, squandering of state resources on exorbitant but misconceived meta projects; high cost of living, high unemployment particularly among the youths,’ and the association with drug trafficking. What basis is there to disbelieve, especially when the man is of and for the people; and given the plausible and pragmatic broadcast to the world; the ‘clean’ image/record, the open declaration by this new President that Guyanese can look forward to ‘women working for living wages to cope with high cost of living, and elders receiving adequate pensions and being protected; where our young people can attain higher education standard and find satisfactory jobs when they leave school.’ Under his leadership we’ll see a new ‘society in which our women and girl children can look forward to living in safety and be protected from abuse and violent crime.’ And since none of us thinks it makes sense to have a corrupt opposition, either the PPP is disbanded, maybe after the successful indictment of Jagdeo and some of his gangster ministers for their crimes whilst in power – (he has been ordered not to leave the country until the trial now in swing is over) or it takes up Granger’s ‘extended arm of friendship and join the great movement for national unity.’

The new cabinet.
Right on time

The timing was perfect, as though somehow scripted. The President’s inauguration took place amidst a swell of national pride at the National Stadium on May 26th, the date of Guyana’s 49th year of independence. The rain didn’t stop anyone who had the will to make it to the stadium to witness this auspicious flag raising day; with all the pomp and ceremony befitting the occasion; celebrating and displaying Guyana’s stateliness, its ability to ‘dress it up!’ How timely, Divine Order, I hear my mum say, though she didn’t cry as I imagine many young and elder Guyanese have been doing the past few days. Here, in London, the usually well attended Guyana Folk Festival, probably saw a record high attendance on bank holiday Monday 25th May as the pride reached fever pitch. Local elections, in Guyana are promised to take place before our 50th year of independence. How much hotter can the energy get next year? What greater surge of emotion awaits Guyanese then? How can we remove the stench and blood stains and show that ours is no failed state after all; that economic growth is but a clear vision in the making on an enchanting horizon? Will we remember always to hold our leaders accountable; remind them of their promises for which we gave them permission to lead us, and take responsibility of enabling them to make good of what collectively we feel is right for the people and the country?

It’s an emotional moment, which can cloud judgement so I think it best that single eye stays slightly open. A tenuous statement by Nicholas Birns leaves me wondering what move our new President will make at an international level. Though the PPP has been chewing sour grapes and found it difficult to give up their long-held reign, Birns notes that as an opposition they might have something to contribute to Guyana on the world stage ‘as indicated with the relatively friendly relationship between (former) President Ramotar and Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro, which could help Guyana continue to be in proportional dialogue with both Venezuela and the United States’ (my italics). There’s something unsavoury about this. Is Guyana to be considered some bridge to foster relationship between these two rival states? Is this then the ‘good seat’ taken up by Granger? From a socialist perspective I see this as the curious interplay of forces for and against neo-colonialism. Venezuela, headquarters of ALBA (Bolivarian Alliance for the People of our Americas), and formerly led by the progressive Hugo Chavez is clearly anti neo-colonialism, and the capitalist US. Will Granger curb the geographical obscurity, the wayward economic indicators of Guyana by exploring opportunities with ALBA? Its members, include, Venezuela, Cuba, Antigua and Barbuda, Bolivia, Dominica, Equador, Nicaragua, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; it was recently joined (in 2014) by Grenada and St Kitts and Nevis; Suriname is a guest member.

Joining ALBA, exploring how this ‘intergovernmental organisation working toward social, political and economic integration for Latin America and the Caribbean’ seems to me to make sense; if Guyana really means to take its ‘independence’ to a next level, that is. Will the new government regard this as a progressive move particularly given the existence of PetroCaribe, established by ALBA to offer ‘preferential oil trade between countries in the region’; and a television service, ‘TeleSur’ that, for obvious reasons aims to compete with US networks? Importantly, will the new government consider the possibilities of SUCRE (Unified System for Regional Compensation), a currency adopted by ALBA as an alternative to the US dollar for international trading?’ After all, what’s presently the value of the Guyanese Dollar? Clearly it’s too early to say, and I can’t pretend to know Granger and the new government’s broader politics. My cousin reminds me that though Granger's former role as Chief of Staff to the Guyana's Defence Force would bring needed discipline to Guyana, he'll face some serious obstacles during his term. These include the Guyana Sugar Corporation (Guysuco), bauxite, rice, timber industries, the health care system among many others. But he's there now, has the chance if he yields to vision.


So finally I trust these burdens rest on a man whose shoulders can handle it; I know the vision has to be more far reaching than those immediate promises, especially if Granger intends to maintain his popularity against determined opposers. For now, with my fellow Guyanese I say congratulations to the newly elected President of Guyana. You’ve given us the hope we needed right now and if those heartically expressed promises are not merely intended to romance the foolhardy you and your wisely selected ministers will have our continued blessings and support.

Shout Out

IMAGES courtesy of facebook posts.

Some links used

Guyana election BBC News: Ex-general David Granger wins Guyana election

Swearing in video of Granger; refer for citations from him in the above.

FCO Minister comments on Guyana election results

Nicholas Birns citations.

Results breakdown by region

Extra Judicial Killings in Guyana: “Champion of the Earth” Presides Over Death Squad Regime

Guyana constitution

A time to heal

About ALBA